Archive for the 'Search Marketing' Category

« Previous Entries Next Entries »

Sucks to be You – New SEM Strategy

I got a great taste of the SEM underbelly while doing some research into interactive wireframing tools.

Check out the screenshot of a SERP returned while searching for “Axure”. It was interesting to see that two of the top three paid search positions were filled by competitors blatantly using Axure’s corporate name as a call-to-action.

Axure Serp

The trademark policy for Google Adwords is, at best, vague. The onus for filing a complaint falls is the responsibility of the company claiming a violation.

Related posts:

What the Future of SEO Looks Like

I’ve been reading a number of interesting articles about the imminent death of search engine optimization. Frankly, traditional SEO has been languishing on its death bed for the last several years. While this doesn’t bode well for the folks who have built careers out search optimization, we’re going to see a lot of new opportunities for smart marketers able to marry traditional research with search engine savvy.

I’ll explain.

Google has been moving towards more personalized search services for the last couple of years. Much of this is driven by new principles of the semantic web and the advent of web services and media types that compete with traditional web content for relevancy. Who’s to say, for example, that someone searching for Angelina Jolie will be interested in viewing news more so than her videos or photos?


Google’s New Personalization Tools

Google no longer wants to prioritize content for you—they want their users to do it themselves. This approach is now clearly apparent with the promote and remove functionality now showing up on a lot of search results.

Expect to see more of this technology in the coming months. I strongly believe that search personalization will only become more pronounced in future—both user-managed personalization and machine-generated based on your “personalization profile”: personalization based on both your prior activity and the behaviors of users similar to you.

So what does personalized search mean for the traditional SEO? If you deconstruct the process of SEO it breaks down into three parts:

  1. The ability to forecast and predict how search engines will assign relevancy
  2. The understanding of the terminology used by target users (and their search heuristics)
  3. Modification of web pages and content to optimize for the top two parts

The combination of these elements fundamentally drives search optimization. With personalized search, however, #1 and #3 lose their importance, while #2 because vital. The future of SEO hinges on user research.

User research and profiling has gained importance in user experience design, interactive strategy, and digital marketing. SEOs will also need to become user researchers if they hope to excel. Not only will they need to gain insights into how people search, they need to be able to understand who their users are, how they behave, and what their needs are. This goes way beyond traditional keyword and terminology research—SEOs will need to “get inside the heads” of their users—gaining understanding into demographics, psychographics, and technographics.

The future of SEO may hinge on the ability of marketers to truly understand the makeup of their target customers. This may kill off a good number of the traditional number-crunching SEOs, but the savvy and innovative players will find lucrative opportunities to optimize for the next generation of search experiences.

 

Related posts:

Google AdWords Reports Now Lets You Download Graphs

Google made a small change to its report download option that may save SEMs time. You can now download a report graph as a PNG that can be cut and pasted into reports.

In the past, the data had to be pulled into Excel and then graphed. This took up a lot of unneeded effort—especially when drafting a quick campaign report. It would great to see Google support comparison charting and more visualization exports in Analytics.

Related posts:

What’s in a FOAF anyway?

I’ve been doing some research on Web 3.0 and semantic search. There are a lot of exciting and groundbreaking new technologies emerging that could reinvent the Internet. It will become increasingly important for web marketers and digital strategists to stay on top of these advances—there are numerous communications and marketing applications.

One of these new technologies is the Friend of a Friend project, or FOAF. FOAF is an XML-based method for organization and cataloging the relationships between people’s profiles. By understanding the relationships between people, data, and relationships, FOAF attempts to build a uniform method for sharing the types of information users store on social networking websites like Facebook and LinkedIn. In fact, a great example of FOAF-like technologies is the “People You May Know” feature on Facebook.

The real promise of FOAF is to create a new data model that will suggest connections between people and—more interestingly—people and information.

Just imagine the value this type of data and intelligence could have to marketers and advertisers. Online ad targeting hasn’t evolved much in the last five years. Protocols like FOAF may be the catalyst to take online advertising to the next level. Imagine being able to target a campaign based on psychographics. Understanding how your target market operates on the web is one thing that FOAF can help to define.

Clearly there are issues with the technologies. Not only has adoption been slow and held back by the confusion and inherent geekiness that’s held back the growth of the semantic web. There are also many issues about security and data protection. Regardless, these technologies are on the move and it won’t be long until the possibilities seen with FOAF (and similar protocols like XFN and SIOC) are realized.

Anyone can create a FOAF profile. You can use a this wizard to create the file and upload it to your website.

Related posts:

Google Can Now Index Adobe Flash Content

Lo and behold! Google has greatly improved its ability to index Flash content.

This improvement has some wide-reaching implications for web developers. The “use of Flash vs. indexability” dialog that is an element of nearly all web projects just may eventually become a thing of the past.

Related posts:

« Previous Entries Next Entries »